Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6596 From: krecik AT ii DOT uni DOT wroc DOT pl (Grzegorz Nowakowski) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: EMAC Date: 29 Jul 1996 09:35:47 GMT Organization: Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique, UPS/CNRS, Orsay,FRANCE Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <4t30r5$5hd AT dfw-ixnews2 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: hp20.lri.fr In-reply-to: Dave Pearson's message of Fri, 26 Jul 1996 18:59:57 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Sorry, I know this question doesn't belong to the newsgroup, but I am curious. In article Dave Pearson writes: [snip] > > Some good *POWERFUL* *EASY-TO-USE* DOS editors are: > > > > BOXER > > MULTI-EDIT > > However, either of those editors are free software. Is Multi-Edit? I used it for some time before I managed to install Emacs and all the time I was sure I have pirated it. BTW, ME in fact is very powerful, esp. for programming. -- Grzegorz Nowakowski -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GC dpu s:- a- C++(++++) ULSH P+>+++ L+>++++ E+(+++) W N++ o? K? w---() O? M- V? PS PE Y+ PGP-@ t+ 5? X? R+@ tv--- b+(+++) DI? D+ G e-> h* r-- y ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ finger hayden AT vax1 DOT mankato DOT msus DOT edu for info about geek codes