Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6499
From: iNFiK <randolp1 AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: djgpp as first compiler
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 11:30:16 -0700
Organization: Daemonics
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <31FA6038.38E1@ix.netcom.com>
References: <4sobl5$b01 AT news DOT mpu DOT com> <4srg5a$m9t AT status DOT gen DOT nz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: srf-ca3-12.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Bruce Foley wrote:
> 
> mschulter AT mach1 DOT mpu DOT com (Margo Schulter) wrote:
> 
> >Finally, I don't need to be a C expert to appreciate the benefits of a
> >flat memory model and a UNIX-like orientation. When running MS-DOG with
> >a 32-bit CPU, why not use a 32-bit compiler?                                   ~~~~~~
> 
> MS-DOG?!?  This sounds like a Freudian slip if I have ever heard one:)
> But then again, the G key is not so close to the S key, so perhaps you
> are trying to tell us something?
> 
> Also, if this is a new operating from microsoft, where was all the
> hype?  where was all the marketting? The hysteria?
> 
> MS-DOG: The operating system with more "byte"
> 
> Bruce.

hey, i run MS-DOG also ... its way better than DOS!