Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6338
From: web183 AT charweb DOT org (patrick fox)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: c:\Compiling............     Zzzzz..... :)
Date: 23 Jul 1996 13:26:58 GMT
Organization: Charlotte's Web, Charlotte NC
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <4t2jv2$mc6@news.charweb.org>
References: <199607161225 DOT IAA19062 AT delorie DOT com> <837539842snz AT tsys DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wilbur.charweb.org
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

I use msdos and linux and I like the unix-isms. They make me feel more 
welcome in dos ;-)

-Pat

Tom Wheeley (tomw AT tsys DOT demon DOT co DOT uk) wrote:
: In article <199607161225 DOT IAA19062 AT delorie DOT com>
:            dj AT delorie DOT com "DJ Delorie" writes:

: > > I think everyone agrees when i say that to much "UNIXism" has made DJGPP 
: > > slow :)
: > 
: > I'd also like to know which unixisms you'd like to throw away, and why
: > you feel that they'd improve the compilation speed.
: > 

: The only thing about gcc that I can think of as presumably slowing it down
: other than its optimisation and generality, is its use of the temporary files.

: I can't see a good way to avoid this without a massive redesign of gcc (in
: DOS this is, no -pipe here :)

: AFAICS, all the other `unix-isms' which DJGPP supports are simply in libc or
: whatever, and are just linked in at the end.

: .splitbung
: -- 
: #include <stdio.h>                  /* The .splitbung super .sig system! */
: #include <string.h>
: main(){FILE *f;int c;char s[99];puts("fav .sig: ");fgets(s,99,stdin);strtok
: (s,"\n");f=fopen(s,"rb");while((c=getc(f))!=EOF)putchar(c);if(f)fclose(f);}