Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6136
From: Tom Wheeley <tomw AT tsys DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: c:\Compiling............     Zzzzz..... :)
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 96 17:57:22 GMT
Organization: City Zen FM
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <837539842snz@tsys.demon.co.uk>
References: <199607161225 DOT IAA19062 AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: tomw AT tsys DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <199607161225 DOT IAA19062 AT delorie DOT com>
           dj AT delorie DOT com "DJ Delorie" writes:

> > I think everyone agrees when i say that to much "UNIXism" has made DJGPP 
> > slow :)
> 
> I'd also like to know which unixisms you'd like to throw away, and why
> you feel that they'd improve the compilation speed.
> 

The only thing about gcc that I can think of as presumably slowing it down
other than its optimisation and generality, is its use of the temporary files.

I can't see a good way to avoid this without a massive redesign of gcc (in
DOS this is, no -pipe here :)

AFAICS, all the other `unix-isms' which DJGPP supports are simply in libc or
whatever, and are just linked in at the end.

..splitbung
-- 
#include <stdio.h>                  /* The .splitbung super .sig system! */
#include <string.h>
main(){FILE *f;int c;char s[99];puts("fav .sig: ");fgets(s,99,stdin);strtok
(s,"\n");f=fopen(s,"rb");while((c=getc(f))!=EOF)putchar(c);if(f)fclose(f);}