Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6025
From: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: go-32 and Linux DOSEMU
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 00:01:54 CDT
Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <31eb2242.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <199607151019 DOT GAA00705 AT fcshome DOT stoneham DOT ma DOT us>
Reply-To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: clio.rice.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> big enough). I had gotten it to where it appeared to work, then I 
> constructed a 6-mb file for testing, and found that sometimes seemingly
> benign commands caused a segmentation violation. Couldn't figure it out.
> But when I upgraded to the new CWSDPMI the entire problem went away.

Probably the insufficient internal heap bug in CWSDPMI.  The default size
was increased in r2 so you can now allocate up to around 20Mb of data in
small pieces before badness.  You can use CWSPARAM to bump it more if you
need to edit 15Mb binary files :-)