Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:5905
From: pvkeer AT vub DOT ac DOT be (Vankeerberghen Pieter)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Executable size
Date: 12 Jul 1996 09:39:39 GMT
Organization: Brussels Free Universities VUB/ULB
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <4s56gr$e00@rc1.vub.ac.be>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 960711095412 DOT 6763E-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: orca.vub.ac.be
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il) wrote:

: On Thu, 11 Jul 1996 j DOT aldrich6 AT genie DOT com wrote:

: > P.S.:  I would like to point out something else as well - under DJGPP v1,
: > the stubbed images were indeed smaller than with v2, but the go32
: > extender was 3 times as large as CWSDPMI.

: To say nothing of the fact that go32 would be loaded anew for every child 
: program, which would cause your system to run out of DOS memory awful 
: fast.  Anybody who tried to run recursive Make's with v1.x knows what I'm 
: talking about.

True, that IS the reason I use V2 ! Now complex makefiles work.