Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:5790
From: Tom Wheeley <tomw AT tsys DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: RAMdisk (was: Bug in stubify.c)
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 96 21:33:32 GMT
Organization: City Zen FM
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <836948012snz@tsys.demon.co.uk>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 960704105712 DOT 23994H-100000 AT is> <4rhr20$181v AT rs18 DOT hrz DOT th-darmstadt DOT de> <31DCC6FA DOT 4E3B AT funcom DOT com>
Reply-To: tomw AT tsys DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <31DCC6FA DOT 4E3B AT funcom DOT com>
           engstad AT funcom DOT com "Pl-Kristian Engstad" writes:

> Alexander Lehmann wrote:
> > Of course, if DOS would support pipes for real, we could just
> > use the -pipe option of gcc and save a lot of tmp storage, but it
> > doesn't.
> 
> Why don't we get smarter by writing 'tcsh' as a shell to Windows? I've
> seen Cygnus' 'bash'. It should be possible to get rid of all references
> to Dos within Win95, or am I wrong?

Yes, but I can't say I'd trust a pipe between Windows95 `processes';
especially between 4 seperate Dos Boxes.

It'd be very nice to have, come to think of it.

..splitbung
-- 
* TQ 1.0 * The 'Just So Quotes'.
I used to drive a Heisenberg Uncertainty car, but I could never read the 
speedometer without getting lost.