Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 19:29:16 +0800 (GMT)
From: Orlando Andico <orly AT gibson DOT eee DOT upd DOT edu DOT ph>
To: Tom Wheeley <tomw AT tsys DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Does DJGPP conform to ANSI-C standards with the for () ?
In-Reply-To: <835650546snz@tsys.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.93.960625192846.1245A-100000@gibson.eee.upd.edu.ph>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Mon, 24 Jun 1996, Tom Wheeley wrote:

> > This is not valid C code for at least several reasons:
> > 
> > 1) main must return int.  void is not acceptable.
> 
> True
> 
> > 2) main must take either void parameters or an int and a char **.
> >    an undefined param list is not acceptable.
> 
> Are you sure?  I was under the impression that it was allowed by the ANSI
> standard due to the large amount of code which would become undefined.
> Thus the smallest strictly conforming program is
> 
> main(){}


Nope. A function without a declared return type is assumed to return 'int'