Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4458
From: Tom Wheeley <tomw AT tsys DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: RE: printf("%s",0) - Segmentation fault
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 96 23:22:21 GMT
Organization: City Zen FM
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <833671341snz@tsys.demon.co.uk>
References: <01BB4FB0 DOT 9776BC00 AT vessers DOT mpce DOT mq DOT edu DOT au>
Reply-To: tomw AT tsys DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <01BB4FB0 DOT 9776BC00 AT vessers DOT mpce DOT mq DOT edu DOT au>
           vessers AT mpce DOT mq DOT edu DOT au "Victor R. Essers" writes:

> Oh, come on! Why not:
> 
> (pp ? "" : pp)
> 
> I've never seen any C implementation that treats NULL as something other
> than 0, so the above code is much more elegant.

NULL is defined to be 0 in the context of pointers.

(of course internally a NULL pointer almost never is 0, but this is getting
too close to c.l.c)

Personally, always choose your method as it reads well in my mind.  (For
numbers and pseudobooleans too).

..splitbung
-- 
* TQ 1.0 * The 'Just So Quotes'.
"I'm a Leo.  Leos don't believe in this astrology stuff."
    	-- Tom Neff