Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:3993
From: malcolm AT manawatu DOT gen DOT nz (Malcolm Taylor)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ELF wanted
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 20:39:39 GMT
Organization: Grafik Software
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <4nlg8i$u4v@news.manawatu.gen.nz>
References: <199605151048 DOT GAA06639 AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: malcolm AT manawatu DOT gen DOT nz
NNTP-Posting-Host: malcolm.manawatu.gen.nz
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Martynas Kunigelis <martynas DOT kunigelis AT VM DOT KTU DOT LT> wrote:
>>Perhaps the better course is to work with binutils to create Windows
>>compatible EXEs containing stabs or COFF debug info.  Would it not be
>>illuminating to recompile Microsoft's MFC libraries with GCC and
>>compare code size and performance?
>>
>  You're absolutely right. I'd love DJGPP to support Win32. But what about
>  the Cygnus port? Does it pay to start a parallel project?

The Cygnus port is GPLed. You cannot create commercial exe's and sell
them without distributing the source or a linkable form af your
program. Also it doesn't run under DOS and has no compatibility with
Win32s (becoming less necessary nowdays however). Of coarse then there
is the fact that it is not DJGPP :-)

Malcolm