Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:3021 From: alexlehm AT rbg DOT informatik DOT th-darmstadt DOT de (Alexander Lehmann) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: [Q:] Recursive make ?? Date: 23 Apr 1996 12:37:37 GMT Organization: Technische Hochschule Darmstadt Lines: 25 Message-ID: <4liiuh$1b04@rs18.hrz.th-darmstadt.de> References: <4lhsaa$c5m AT news DOT cea DOT fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: hp62.rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Hans-Bernhard Broeker (Broeker AT axp02 DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) wrote: : The same problem arises once you need advanced textutilities like : sed/awk or at least tr for your makefile. You *can* have GNU Make do : some of their work, but at some point, you'll sure need The Real Thing : (tm:-), which might not be available on all desirable platforms. There : could also be bugs in their implementation on some of the weirder OS's : out there, of which you won't ever know until someone gets hit by them : using your 'innocent' little makefile. Even when dealing with unix only, there are so many possibilities why a make process may fail, if you consider the GNU configure scripts or the scripts from e.g. Perl or c-news. Since MS-DOS is plagued with the absence of a suitably featured command processor (and none of the necessary tools), I think supplying an alternate Makefile for DOS/DJGPP is the easiest solution here. bye, Alexander -- Alexander Lehmann, | "On the Internet, alex AT hal DOT rhein-main DOT de (plain, MIME, NeXT) | nobody knows alexlehm AT rbg DOT informatik DOT th-darmstadt DOT de (plain) | you're a dog."