Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:2831 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp From: tgl AT netcom DOT com (Tom Lane) Subject: Re: No more DJGPP on SimTel ??? Message-ID: Sender: tgl AT netcom12 DOT netcom DOT com Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services References: <199604141215 DOT IAA09662 AT delorie DOT com> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 05:33:41 GMT Lines: 27 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp williams AT utkux4 DOT utk DOT edu (Myles Williams) writes: > tgl AT netcom DOT com (Tom Lane) writes: > Keith is unwilling to say much about what happened, but it appears > that he had a falling-out with his recent employers at Coast to Coast, > and is now working for Walnut Creek. CTC seems to be trying to keep up > Has he said whether this "falling out" had anything to do with CTC's > copyright policy (in which they forbid distribution of public domain > software packaged on their CDs)? AFAIK, the *only* thing he's said about the cause of the breakup is that CTC has threatened to sue him if he says anything about it. > See ftp://ftp.coast.net/SimTel/README.COPYRIGHT for details. I looked at this, and offhand I don't see any problem with it, aside from the obviously unenforceable claim that they own redistribution rights to individual items of PD software obtained from their archives. (How would they prove you got it from them and not some other source? Lawyers run amuck again.) But their archive indexes and organization represent value-added, and certainly they have a right to restrict makers of CDs or other collections from using that work for free. I believe Walnut Creek and nearly every other big archive collection put similar restrictions on their archiving work. Collection copyrights are a well-established legal principle; but they apply to *collections*, not individual items. regards, tom lane