Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:2041
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DPMI in v2 vs. v1
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 18:06:44 +0200
Organization: NetVision LTD.
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960321180612.25389D-100000@is>
References: <4ikv3b$1dmc AT rs18 DOT hrz DOT th-darmstadt DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <4ikv3b$1dmc@rs18.hrz.th-darmstadt.de> 
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp


On 19 Mar 1996, Alexander Lehmann wrote:

> However, when comparing the memory values with go32-v2 with the ones reported
> with go32 from v1, it seems that the Win95 DPMI has more virtual memory
> available, but it is not available to djgppv2 programs.

Can you post what go32 and go32-v2 reported?