Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 07:36:59 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: "Rafael R. Sevilla" <rsevilla AT upd DOT edu DOT ph>
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Help with assembler in djgpp
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960306015101.4871A-100000@sauron>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960307073256.27514B-100000@is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Wed, 6 Mar 1996, Rafael R. Sevilla wrote:

> both ways? I've read about the sed script which did that which was posted
> on the mail archives that converts standard 80x86 code into AT&T format, 
> but I need one that also works in the opposite direction. 

Try FSDB debugger (it comes with djdev200.zip).  It disassembles the 
instruction in the format you are used to.

> And also another question. When we write an assembler routine in djgpp
> that is called by a C function, do the usual BP addressing techniques used
> in real mode DOS still work the same way? Does it still follow the large-

Again, I'd suggest looking with FSDB into a working program (you can 
write a small C program for this).

> This was one crucial issue which was not addressed by the
> FAQ at all.

The FAQ doesn't usually include questions which weren't asked at least 
twice.  For the above issue, you are the first one to ask.