Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1333
From: jesper AT chaos DOT fys DOT dtu DOT dk (Jesper Skovhus Thomsen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Problems with cc1.exe (djgpp v 2.0)
Date: 19 Feb 1996 09:54:51 GMT
Organization: Physics Department, DTU, Denmark
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <4g9hdb$ene@news.uni-c.dk>
References: <DMrz0J DOT Cwu AT granite DOT mv DOT net> <4fumok$pr7 AT news DOT cea DOT fr> <4funbp$1uo AT news DOT uni-c DOT dk> <3123d1b7 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chaos.fys.dtu.dk
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Charles Sandmann (sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu) wrote:
> > > Try stubediting cc1.exe to have 512K stack and see if that helps (?)
> > Yes it did help -- now it works !
> This is a new problem.  In V1.12 under DPMI, I don't ever remember hearing
> these complaints.  Also, in the V2.0 beta, we didn't hear these complaints.
> So, either GCC 2.6.3 used a lot less stack than 2.7.2 does, or the beta 
> testers don't compile huge C++ files, or maybe a bit of both.

I cant say about C++ because I "only" uses C. However on might argue that
it is bad programming style to have a single huge C file insted of a
series of smaller C files that are linked together (I was able to compile
both libjpeg and libtiff without any [compiler] problems).

> There is a 2.6.3 cc1plus.exe from V2b3 available that we could use to 
> check this (it's also the only way to use findfirst or C++ programs
> needing packed structures).

I have found a beta 3 distribution at:
http://pizza.unix-ag.uni-kl.de:8001/djgpp-v2.0/
and downloaded gcc263b-beta3.zip.
I will try to see if the cc1.exe from the beta 3 distbution can compile
my program without any stubediting.

Jesper Skovhus Thomsen