Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1260
From: wkim+@pitt.edu (Wonkoo Kim)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Why bigger exe size with LIBGRX+BCC2GRX v2.0?
Date: 20 Feb 1996 03:17:08 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
Lines: 13
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4gbefk$8u8@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>
References: <4g3mp0$qit AT usenet DOT srv DOT cis DOT pitt DOT edu> <3128d8c4 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: wkim+@pitt.edu (Wonkoo Kim)
NNTP-Posting-Host: ehdup-c1-10.rmt.net.pitt.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Thanks to DJ, Harmut, and Charles Sandmann, for their good explanations.

I remember that we said v2.0 would occupy less memory by removing
go32 and taking DPMI scheme.  Is it still a valid statement even though libc 
got larger by moving some go32 functions into it?  (when assuming that 
we had "v2.0 with go32" for the same gcc and libraries.)

Thanks again.
Best wishes,

//--------------------------------------------------------------------
// Wonkoo Kim (wkim+@pitt.edu)