Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1166 From: wald AT theory DOT lcs DOT mit DOT edu (David Wald) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Thanks, and NT question (was Re: DJGPP v2 woes :() Date: 15 Feb 1996 19:30:05 GMT Organization: Theory of Computation, LCS, MIT Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <4ft5lv$lke AT serra DOT unipi DOT it> <4ft3jr$sb6 AT odin DOT diku DOT dk> <31227288 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu In-reply-to: Charles Sandmann's message of Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:38:48 CST To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp In article <31227288 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> Charles Sandmann writes: >DJ and I plan to publish a paper with concrete proof that no matter >how extensive a beta you do, bugs will be discovered within 5 hours of >any software release :-) How long are we given to find a bug in your proof? >> I'm hitting the same sort of problem (infernal compiler error with >> when compiling template-laden C++ code). > >Since they work on other platforms, two suggestions: > 1) Stubedit the stack size to 512K or 1Mb in CC1PLUS.EXE, and Thank you very much; together with heapfix, that seems to have done it. > 2) Try to compile under something like Windows. Interestingly, that didn't: I tried under Windows/NT (I know that's not *quite* like Windows), and discovered that, while NT gives me DPMI, go32-v2 tells me that I only get 56MB RAM and 0MB of swap. Thus, there are files I can now compile under DOS/CWSDPMI that I can't compile under NT. Does anyone have any clues on how to deal with this? It would be nice to be able to compile DJGPP programs in the background on NT, so I can get other work done. -David -- ============================================================================ David Wald http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~wald/ wald AT theory DOT lcs DOT mit DOT edu ============================================================================