Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:865
From: terra AT diku DOT dk (Morten Welinder)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: djgpp distribution
Date: 7 Feb 1996 11:36:57 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, U of Copenhagen
Lines: 15
Sender: terra AT tyr DOT diku DOT dk
Message-ID: <4fa2sp$2te@odin.diku.dk>
References: <4f76h0$tct AT trog DOT dra DOT hmg DOT gb>
NNTP-Posting-Host: odin.diku.dk
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

itmiller AT taz DOT dra DOT hmg DOT gb () writes:

>Is it safe to assume that, say, djdev200.zip from v2 beta 5
>is identical to the same distribution file from earlier betas?
>Or could there be the odd minor correction in the more recent
>release despite it having the same file name?

There are any number of minor corrections as well as a couple
of major ones.  Blame dos' 8+3 file names for not allowing
"beta5" to be part of the name.

AFAIK, beta 5 is identical to the first official release,
modulo details in a readme-file.

Morten