Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:17:13 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii To: Charles Sandmann Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: GCC 2.7.2 On Sun, 4 Feb 1996, Charles Sandmann wrote: > Actually, -O3 inlines everything in sight, including static routines (and > even non-static ones in the same module). So the executable may get much > larger in size. Unless you use lots of tiny routines, I prefer -O2. My experience is that -O3 almost never makes things better, except, maybe, when compiling a well-modularized library. When in doubt, I usually make it both ways and time the results.