Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:727
From: t DOT s DOT abbott AT larc DOT nasa DOT gov (Terence Abbott)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Speed,V1&V2,Pentium&486
Date: 1 Feb 1996 16:02:01 GMT
Organization: NASA -Langley Research Center
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <4eqo5p$m4i@reznor.larc.nasa.gov>
References: <C2C10C3610 AT dwaf-hri DOT pwv DOT gov DOT za>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tsabbo.larc.nasa.gov
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <C2C10C3610 AT dwaf-hri DOT pwv DOT gov DOT za>, ECE AT dwaf-hri DOT pwv DOT gov DOT za says...
>
>Here is a wee bizzarity for those who collect such...
>Results :-
>486DX2-66  DJGPP V1  1793562 Iterations/sec
>486DX2-66  DJGPP V2  1847715 Iterations/sec
>Pentium 75 DJGPP V1  7585273 Iterations/sec
>Pentium 75 DJGPP V2  4136363 Iterations/sec
>The granularity of the clock ticks is about 0.055sec.
>

Here's another interesting note.  I've got a real-time
graphics program (~65k lines of source code) that I've
compiled and executed with the following results:
  DJGPP 1.12m4 with GRX 1.03 :  18 iterations/sec.
  DJGPP 2.0beta4 with GRX 2.0:  8 iterations/sec.
All on a 486/66.

I've tried the V2.0 with both the MS DPMI and CWSDPMI
with the same performance results.  The newer versions
are giving 1/2 the performance of the V1 programs.

Any ideas?
   Terry Abbott   t DOT s DOT abbott AT larc DOT nasa DOT gov