Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4115
Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!barney.gvi.net!news.netrail.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!rice!news!sandmann
From: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: v2.0beta4 problem
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 1996 08:22:41 CST
Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <30ebe2b1.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <DKnL43 DOT EAJ AT jade DOT mv DOT net>
Reply-To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: clio.rice.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> OK, that works. But I can't understand why beta3 worked well
> without LFN set at all. I installed beta4 in the same way as beta3.

Well, it should work just fine, I'm not sure what the problem is.

> What if I want LFN? Do I need to install in a special way?

No, you should get LFN as default.  While I haven't installed b4 on
my W95 box yet, the prior intermediate release worked fine for me
and I don't think anything changed.  I'll try to check soon.