Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:3424
Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!barney.gvi.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!hgmp.mrc.ac.uk!daresbury!s-crim1!mbbad
From: mbbad AT s-crim1 DOT dl DOT ac DOT uk (I. Badcoe)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ASM functions returning values
Date: 24 Nov 1995 10:35:47 GMT
Organization: SERC Daresbury Lab, Warrington, U.K.
Lines: 13
References: <48sk3q$qmj AT osfb DOT aber DOT ac DOT uk> <DIGK8G DOT A90 AT cfanews DOT harvard DOT edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: s-crim1.dl.ac.uk
To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

NIGEL  HUGHES (ngh94 AT aber DOT ac DOT uk) wrote:
: Dear All,
: 	Quick question. I have some asm routines (in a separate
: .S file which I link in) and have parameters being passed OK no
: probs. The question I have is, where do I leave a value so it
: is returned by the function? Stack a register (%eax sounds likely) or what?

I seen to remember that int returns are in eax (and pointers too ?) but I
think that there are compiler switches which can lead to float returns being
left on top of the coprocessor stack.

	Badders