Date: Mon, 6 Nov 1995 08:14:44 -0500 From: kagel AT quasar DOT bloomberg DOT com To: A DOT APPLEYARD AT fs2 DOT mt DOT umist DOT ac DOT uk Cc: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu Subject: Re: generating stand-alone .exe files Reply-To: kagel AT ts1 DOT bloomberg DOT com Errors-To: postmaster AT ns1 From: "A.Appleyard" Date: Sat, 4 Nov 1995 12:39:50 GMT Priority: normal X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.22 Content-Type: text Content-Length: 713 resta AT iei DOT pi DOT cnr DOT it (Giovanni Resta) wrote (Subject: Re: generating stand-alone .exe files):- > Do coff2exe -s c:\djgpp\bin\go32.exe myprog.cof and don't forget > the "-s" switch (as I done once) or your go32.exe will be destroyed ! To that idea, I say "-sssssssssssssssssssssssss". It is too easy to forget once in a while to insert oddments such as "-s" switches. That is why I prefer to create a file C:\DOS\GO32ADD.BAT containing this line:- copy /B c:\djgpp\bin\go32.exe + %1 %2.exe and I just type e.g. GO32ADD A.OUT MIAOW and lo-and-behold an .EXE every time with no meed to remember my GO32.EXE's full pathname every time and no risk of overwriting it by omitting something. But why not create a GO32ADD.BAT as: coff2exe -s c:\djgpp\bin\go32.exe %1 This solves the forgotten flag problem and still uses coff2exe to generate an executable which the docs claim loads faster and runs more efficently than the one made using DOS copy!?!?! -- Art S. Kagel, kagel AT ts1 DOT bloomberg DOT com Variety is the soul of pleasure. -- Aphra Behn