Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1968 Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.NH.Destek.Net!news2.net99.net!news.cais.net!ringer.cs.utsa.edu!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!wnolan+ From: William Nolan Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Serious V2 beta bug... Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 18:38:15 -0400 Organization: Sophomore, Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA Lines: 24 References: <304e74ac DOT sandmann AT praline DOT no DOT NeoSoft DOT com> Nntp-Posting-Host: po8.andrew.cmu.edu To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Excerpts from netnews.comp.os.msdos.djgpp: 6-Sep-95 Re: Serious V2 beta bug... by Charles Sandmann AT praline > Please check out the routines being used; if there are any HW interrupts > involved which don't lock every byte of memory, please notify the author to > remove them from public distribution as they are a bomb waiting to nuke a disk. What you said makes sense -- maybe I should clarify what I was compiling at the time, so you might be able to get a better idea of who was the culprit. I was (in BOTH cases, here) writing a program that used the SB_LIB and the XLIB .a includes. Having only taken a cursory look through both, I can't tell you if they locked memory up okay. It *looked* like the SB_LIB actually did some locking, I didn't check out the XLIB stuff, so I don't know. Are the authors of these two libraries (the XLIB being a conversion from Borland, anyway) reading this newsgroup? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ [@@@| |@@@] [@@@] [@@@] [@@@] [~~~|/\|~~~] [~~~] [~~~]_ [~~~]_ William Nolan -- wn22 AT andrew DOT cmu DOT edu [!!!!!!!!!!] [!!!] [!!!!!] [!!!!!] \ _ /\ _ / [_ _] [_ _ _] [_ _ _]