Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1913 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!dsi.unimi.it!dm.unibo.it!despina!rossi From: Davide Rossi Subject: Re: Graphics performance under v2.0 Sender: news AT dm DOT unibo DOT it Organization: Department of Mathematics, University of Bologna, Italy References: <1995Sep5 DOT 110137 AT uctvms DOT uct DOT ac DOT za> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 16:32:10 GMT Lines: 22 To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp On 5 Sep 1995 stwand07 AT uctvms DOT uct DOT ac DOT za wrote: > Hi > > I read somebody complain recently that graphics under V2.0 (ie LibGRX 2.0) > is (are?) really slow compared to v 1. Just how much slower are graphics > operations, and is this caused by the DPMI host controlling paging, etc. > or due to "beta" code that is less optimised than previously ? > > Obviously programs working unders Windows is an advantage, but if > performance suffers I'll be staying with v 1 for quite a while to > come! > I used _far* and movedata with PixView. I built a home page for it: check it out at http://www.cs.unibo.it/~rossi/pixview it is still under test (the page, I mean) so I don't know if it works... Ciao, Davide.