Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1905
Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ee.und.ac.za!iafrica.com!ticsa.com!cstatd.cstat.co.za!ucthpx!uctvms.uct.ac.za!stwand07
From: stwand07 AT uctvms DOT uct DOT ac DOT za
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Graphics performance under v2.0
Date: 5 Sep 95 11:01:37 +0200
Organization: University of Cape Town
Lines: 14
Nntp-Posting-Host: uctvms.uct.ac.za
To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Hi

I read somebody complain recently that graphics under V2.0 (ie LibGRX 2.0)
is (are?) really slow compared to v 1. Just how much slower are graphics
operations, and is this caused by the DPMI host controlling paging, etc.
or due to "beta" code that is less optimised than previously ?

Obviously programs working unders Windows is an advantage, but if
performance suffers I'll be staying with v 1 for quite a while to 
come!

Bye
Mark Wodrich.
email : mwodrich AT eleceng DOT uct DOT ac DOT za