Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1503
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!mv.mv.com!kaikow
From: kaikow AT standards DOT com
Subject: Re: Win 95
Originator: kaikow AT mv DOT mv DOT com
Nntp-Posting-Host: mv.mv.com
Sender: kaikow AT standards DOT com
Reply-To: kaikow AT standards DOT com
Organization: MV Communications, Inc.
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 1995 20:46:38 GMT
References: <DCIKoq DOT 2ry AT mv DOT mv DOT com> <3vi1pu$31q AT phcoms4 DOT seri DOT philips DOT nl> <40i4o1$1h3 AT linux DOT nildram DOT co DOT uk>
To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

The longer/different file names are the main problem.
Previous responses stated that djgpp would still have the 8.3 restriction 
if used with Win 95.


In article <40i4o1$1h3 AT linux DOT nildram DOT co DOT uk>,
David Cantrell  <david AT integration DOT co DOT uk> wrote:
>>In article <DCIKoq DOT 2ry AT mv DOT mv DOT com>, kaikow AT standards DOT com says...
>>
>>
>>Any target date for a version of djgpp that will compile under Win 95?
>>
>> ... Stuff deleted ...
>
>I use DJGPP in a DOS-box in Win95, without any problems (apart from my 
>code ... :-)  This is for compiling DOS programs.  Unless you're trying 
>to compile Windoze programs, you shouldn't be having any problems.
>
>Are you trying to write GUI stuff?
>