Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:1269 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!mv.mv.com!kaikow From: kaikow AT standards DOT com Subject: Re: Win 95 Originator: kaikow AT mv DOT mv DOT com Nntp-Posting-Host: mv.mv.com Sender: kaikow AT standards DOT com Reply-To: kaikow AT standards DOT com Organization: MV Communications, Inc. Date: Mon, 31 Jul 1995 10:48:19 GMT References: <3vi1pu$31q AT phcoms4 DOT seri DOT philips DOT nl> To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp I just took a look at the readme and INDEX files in the GNAT directory at Yale. It states that GNAT is ADA, not C/C++. In article <3vi1pu$31q AT phcoms4 DOT seri DOT philips DOT nl>, Wiljan Derks wrote: >In article , kaikow AT standards DOT com says... >> >> >>Any target date for a version of djgpp that will compile under Win 95? >> >>I'm concerned about utilities such as uudecode, uuencode, zip, unzip, >>gzip, gunzip, ... >> >> >I am realy wondering how the migration paths of GCC will go. At this >moment there are already at least two ports of gcc to NT. As far as I >understand they should simply run on win95 also, including the generated >code. You can try ftp.cs.yale.edu/pub/gnat. That directory holds the >distribution of GNAT including GCC. I am using that on NT, which works >fine. I am using ADA myself and that can be used to call everything that >is in win32. > >Wiljan >