Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:244
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!gatech!udel!rochester!rocksanne!gnu!not-for-mail
From: leisner AT sdsp DOT mc DOT xerox DOT com (Marty Leisner 25733)
Subject: Re: fork()/join()
Lines: 28
Sender: news AT news DOT wrc DOT xerox DOT com
Reply-To: leisner AT sdsp DOT mc DOT xerox DOT com
Organization: xerox
References: <3qlh05$kcn AT odin DOT diku DOT dk> <3qv6e7$h59 AT jabba DOT ess DOT harris DOT com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 1995 17:49:14 GMT
To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Alan D Zimmerman (azimmer AT rsa DOT hisd DOT harris DOT com) wrote:
: In article <3qlh05$kcn AT odin DOT diku DOT dk>, terra AT diku DOT dk (Morten Welinder) writes:
: > >Joel Hunter (jhunter AT kendaco DOT telebyte DOT com) wrote:
: > >:   Will DJGPP EVER support these functions?  Does anyone care but me
: > >: whether it does or not?  We've got the hardware, so why not do it?
:  
: > fork(), btw, is going to be a pig since it will have to copy the
: > entire running process.  The multi-tasking exec's will behave much
: > better.
: 
I used shared text.
: > 

This should work with djgcc ...
: 
: -- 
: |        Alan D. Zimmerman        | Eagle Scout           SR - 96   |
me too.
: 
: 

-- 
marty
leisner AT sdsp DOT mc DOT xerox DOT com  
Member of the League for Programming Freedom (see http://www.lpf.org/)
Committees do not design!  They are never held responsible, nor are 
they rewarded or punished.  Committees can review.   
				C. Gordon Bell