Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:147 Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!xlink.net!nntp.gmd.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.uni-ulm.de!news.belwue.de!news.belwue.de!green.t-informatik.ba-stuttgart.de!jscharrl From: jscharrl AT ba-stuttgart DOT de (Jochen Scharrlach) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Editor of choice Date: 6 Jun 1995 06:48:16 GMT Organization: Berufsakademie Stuttgart Lines: 29 References: <3qkami$3fg AT fileserv DOT aber DOT ac DOT uk> <3qmj0h$hpt AT gamle DOT ifi DOT uio DOT no> <3qnk05$d8v AT senator-bedfellow DOT MIT DOT EDU> Reply-To: jscharrl AT ba-stuttgart DOT de Nntp-Posting-Host: green.t-informatik.ba-stuttgart.de To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp davis AT space DOT mit DOT edu wrote: > Not anymore. Jed is now available from space.mit.edu in pub/davis/jed. I > will probably release 0.97-9 this weekend. The current version is 0.97-8. > The differences are: OK, I tried it. I, as a emacs-fanatic, have some positive and negative comments about Jed: + small, fast + better font-lock than DOS-Emacs - emacs has (of course) more functions, e.g. menus (even under DOS!) - it's definitly different from emacs, e.g. I wasn't able to load a library and couldn't get any hint from "apropos" Conclusion: If you want a small editor to write C programs or TeX documents with a similar comfort as Emacs offers, take Jed. If you want a huuuuge library of functions, a very reliable program and don't care about disc space and memory requirements, take a look at Emacs. If Jed wants to have the same functionality as Emacs has, it will grow... Bye, Jochen -- ------------------------------------ EMail: jscharrl AT ba-stuttgart DOT de or: acorn1 AT ftp DOT uni-stuttgart DOT de ------------------------------------