Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:106 Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!newsfeed.rice.edu!uw-beaver!uw-coco!nwfocus.wa.com!news.telebyte.com!usenet From: jhunter AT kendaco DOT telebyte DOT com (Joel Hunter) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: fork()/join() Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 22:01:25 GMT Organization: Telebyte North West Silverdale, Wa Lines: 20 References: <3qhk5s$tvn AT news DOT telebyte DOT com> <3qlh05$kcn AT odin DOT diku DOT dk> Nntp-Posting-Host: kendaco.telebyte.com To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp terra AT diku DOT dk (Morten Welinder) wrote: >>Joel Hunter (jhunter AT kendaco DOT telebyte DOT com) wrote: >>: Will DJGPP EVER support these functions? Does anyone care but me >>: whether it does or not? We've got the hardware, so why not do it? >Excuse me first for being a little direct: have you contributed to >djgpp lately? Why don't you grab the latest djgpp alpha test and >add fork()? [join???] Next week is fine. >Regarding having the hardware: so does a Commodore 64. What's your >point? Wow. The first actual down-right rude reply I have ever seen on the DJGPP mailing-list/newsgroup. Since when is ignorance and/or incompetence met with this level of hostility?