To: Stephen Turnbull <turnbull AT shako DOT sk DOT tsukuba DOT ac DOT jp>
Cc: hkelly AT techreps DOT com, djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Subject: Re: oemacs problem
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 11:45:15 -0700
From: Darryl Okahata <darrylo AT hpnmhjw DOT sr DOT hp DOT com>

> Renaming OEmacs's GO32 is not absolutely
> necessary, but I strongly suggest it to avoid any possibility of
> conflict for other DJGPP programs, which should use the stock go32 (it
> has been updated at least 10 times since OEmacs's).  Other solutions

     I'm somewhat surprised that someone's still using OEmacs.  I've
assumed that everyone's using the FSF djgpp Emacs, and so I've done
absolutely nothing to make it work with newer versions of djgpp.

     -- Darryl Okahata
	Internet: darrylo AT sr DOT hp DOT com

DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion or policy of Hewlett-Packard or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.