From: Lars Damerow <bb07779 AT bingsuns DOT cc DOT binghamton DOT edu>
Subject: Re: DJGPP
To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 18:13:57 -0400 (EDT)

From djgpp-bounces AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu Tue May  2 17:06 EDT 1995
Received: from omnigate.clarkson.edu (omnigate.clarkson.edu [128.153.4.2]) by bingnfs1.cc.binghamton.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA13410 for <bb07779 AT bingsuns DOT cc DOT binghamton DOT edu>; Tue, 2 May 1995 17:06:18 -0400
Received: from sun.soe.clarkson.edu by omnigate.clarkson.edu with SMTP (PP) 
          id <04504-0 AT omnigate DOT clarkson DOT edu>; Tue, 2 May 1995 16:08:47 -0400
Received: by sun.soe.clarkson.edu.soe (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03609;
          Tue, 2 May 95 15:18:42 EDT
Received: from Starbase.NeoSoft.COM by sun.soe.clarkson.edu.soe (4.1/SMI-4.1) 
          id AA03577; Tue, 2 May 95 15:17:45 EDT
Received: from praline.no.NeoSoft.com (sandmann AT praline DOT no DOT NeoSoft DOT COM [198.64.57.253]) 
          by Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id OAA05822;
          Tue, 2 May 1995 14:15:07 -0500
Received: (from sandmann AT localhost) by praline.no.NeoSoft.com (8.6.10/8.6.10) 
          id OAA20024; Tue, 2 May 1995 14:15:06 -0500
X-Provider: NeoSoft, Inc.: Internet Service Provider (713) 684-5969
From: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT praline DOT no DOT NeoSoft DOT com>
Message-Id: <199505021915 DOT OAA20024 AT praline DOT no DOT NeoSoft DOT com>
Subject: Re: DJGPP
To: b8003054 AT nas05 DOT kpi DOT edu DOT tw
Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 14:15:05 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: KM5M AT c53000 DOT petrobras DOT anrj DOT br, djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
In-Reply-To: <9505020841 DOT AA11452 AT nas05 DOT kpi DOT edu DOT tw> from "b8003054 AT nas05 DOT kpi DOT edu DOT tw" at May 2, 95 04:41:45 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 374
Status: RO

>> The address of video RAM is re-mapped to the address 0xe0000000. If 
>you want > to access the video RAM, you can use the pointer 0xe00b8000.
>
>Don't do this, use dosmem*() routines or <sys/farptr.h>
>
>This method does not work under Dpmi hosts (like qdpmi, windows, os/2, etc)
>and won't work at all in a few months when V2 is released.
>
>Just say NO to 0xe0000000 addressing!

Does that mean that direct video graphics will not be allowed?  If it is 
not possible to use a pointer directed to video RAM to put pixels on the 
screen, can we set up a segment that gives us that kind of access without 
causing a segmentation fault?  My entire optimized graphics library is at 
stake if we can't!  :(

					...Lars Damerow
					bb07779 AT bingsuns DOT cc DOT binghamton DOT edu
					(try saying THAT ten times fast!)