Reply-To: guido AT michelwh DOT win DOT net (John H. Stockslager)
To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 1995 13:57:03
Subject: Re: gcc = gcc -O2 ?
From: guido AT michelwh DOT win DOT net (John H. Stockslager)

>Comments?
>
>Should -g imply -O0 as the default?
>
>DJ
>

Full optimization by default at the cost of compile-time
performance?? Casual compilations wouldn't offend a soul, but in
the worst case scenerio, what kind of a hit do you expect?

Also, is, or can the "default" options be set via an environment
variable, and thus make the decision in question perhaps
unnecessary?

-john 


-----------------------------------------------------------
John H. Stockslager                  guido AT michelwh DOT win DOT net