Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 18:43:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Aaron Ucko Subject: Re: Interrupts and DMA access To: alh AT engr DOT engr DOT uark DOT edu Cc: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu Organization: Rockhurst College; Kansas City, MO >I don't know if this has come up before or if it already exist, i.e. I >didn't dig real deep in doing my homework, but.. ;) I was thinking, >providing there was enough interest, developing a macro convertor from >(T/M)ASM -> as and vise-versa using maybe flex? The biggest turn off for >djgpp that I've found for most, is the fact they lerned using tasm... >IMHO a true waist considering it's native only to x86, but try telling >others that. This would slow down a programs development cycle, but >would at least attract tasm users to our cause.. ;) could also be used >for Linux, or even other systems. TASM code on a SPARC? Good idea (except for the SPARC one :-). Until recently, I had thought most assemblers were like MASM, etc. -- i.e. using machine-specific opcodes and syntax (making the faulty assumption that assembly code was just a non-portable way to get more internal hardware access and/or speed up functions). --- Aaron Ucko (ucko AT vax1 DOT rockhurst DOT edu; finger for PGP public key) -=- httyp! -=*=-Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.-=*=- Geek code 2.1 [finger hayden AT vax1 DOT mankato DOT msus DOT edu for explanation]: GCS/M/S d(-) H s g+ p? !au a-- w+ v+ C++(+++)>++++ U-(S+)>++++ P+ L>++ 3(-) E-(----) !N>++ K- W(--) M-(--) V(--) po-(--) Y+(++) t(+) !5 j R G tv--(-) b+++ !D(--) B--(---) e>++++(*) u++(@) h!() f(+) r-(--)>+++ n+(-) y?