Date: Tue, 08 Nov 1994 20:37:51 -0500 (CDT)
From: Aaron Ucko <UCKO AT VAX1 DOT ROCKHURST DOT EDU>
Subject: Re: redifinition of rawclock in libc and grx
To: vincent AT physique DOT ens DOT fr
Cc: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Organization: Rockhurst College; Kansas City, MO

>there is a redifinition of rawclock in grx103m1 and libc.a ver112m2
>which library should be modify ...!
>
>this is the compilation error message when I add clock() in the
>mousetest.c prorgram which I rename mvc.c here
>
>gcc -Wall -O -I../include -L../lib -o mvc mvc.c -lgrx -lm 
>mvc.c: In function `mousetest':
>mvc.c:66: warning: int format, long int arg (arg 2)
>fake(.text+0xc): multiple definition of `rawclock'
>mouse.c(.text+0x0): first defined here

I got that message too--the odd thing was, all I had to do was recompile
mouse.c and stick the new .o in libgrx.a.  No source modifications or
anything...I suppose a corollary to the Clarke quote Leisner cited is
"any sufficiently complex software is indistinguishable from magic" :-)

More seriously, I also got a problem involving _IO_stdin et al. when linking
a simple C++ program--seems I needed to remove stdfiles.o from libgpp.a.

--- Aaron Ucko (ucko AT vax1 DOT rockhurst DOT edu; finger for PGP public key) -=- httyp!
-=*=-Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.-=*=-
Geek code 2.1 [finger hayden AT vax1 DOT mankato DOT msus DOT edu for explanation]: 
 GCS/M/S d(-) H s g+ p? !au a-- w+ v+ C++(+++)>++++ U-(S+)>++++ P+ L>++ 3(-) 
 E-(----) !N>++ K- W(--) M-(--) V(--) po-(--) Y+(++) t(+) !5 j R G tv--(-) 
 b+++ !D(--) B--(---) e>++++(*) u++(@) h!() f(+) r-(--)>+++ n+(-) y?