Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 23:08:55 EST
From: peprbv AT cfa0 DOT harvard DOT edu (Bob Babcock)
To: mcastle AT cs DOT umr DOT edu
Cc: kuku AT acds DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de, djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Subject: building go32 with borland 3.1

>Yes, the -3 option is necessary for TASM, but I gathered from the 
>post I copied that there is an undocumented -3 option for BCC which
>generates 386 code (like -2 generates 286 code).  What I was trying
>to figure out is whether or not this was true.

I don't know of any _undocumented_ -3 option to BCC 3.1, but there is a
documented -3 option.  From page 155 of the 3.1 user's guide:
  "-3   This option causes Borland C++ to generate 80386 instructions"
I have not tested how well -3 works.  Borland's Language Express (a small
magazine that gets sent to you periodically if you send in the registation
card) talked about 386 code a while back.