X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 22:21:54 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Message-Id: <3395-Wed26Dec2001222154+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <000401c18e3d$5c0b2cb0$cef8e0d5@zastaixp>
	(tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be)
Subject: Re: gcc 3.03 and libc sources
References:  <000401c18e3d$5c0b2cb0$cef8e0d5 AT zastaixp>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 19:44:32 +0100
> 
> I think there's a rule in either ANSI C++ or C99 that says that
> both values in a conditional expression (?:) need to be the exact
> same type (including signedness).

My C9x draft only says they should be both arithmetic types.