X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 15:28:07 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id: <7704-Wed26Dec2001152807+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3C29C648.87B6170C@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:44:56 +0000)
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0.2 and -ggdb debugging info
References: <3C227C35 DOT 8DC5059 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3C25C254 DOT 2F6BC615 AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3C29C648 DOT 87B6170C AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:44:56 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> No. I tried the following and they produced debug info that makes 'l main'
> work in gdb:
> 
>      -gstabs
>      -gstabs+
>      -gstabs+3
> 
> I tried the following and they produced debug info that makes 'l main'
> fail in gdb:
>  
>      -ggdb
>      -ggdb3

That's strange: AFAIK, -ggdb should be a synonym for -gstabs.  What
about -ggdb3 and -gstabs3: are they equivalent?

Andris, was GCC 3.0.2 configured in some way that makes -ggdb
different from -gstabs?