X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10112161748.AA17509@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: v3.02 vs v2.953 gpp memory [was Re: GCC build with 2.03 refresh OK ...]
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 11:48:51 -0600 (CST)
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "sandmann" at Dec 16, 2001 11:25:38 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Now, I can get the exact same error (different memory numerical values) 
> in W95 by limiting the amount of DPMI memory to 14336Kb.  So it takes 
> 15Mb to compile a null program with GPP 3.02.  

By the way, gpp 2.953 built with the same v2.03 refresh can compile the 
empty 1.cpp program in less than 3.5Mb of memory.

Given the memory requirements of gpp 3.02, I'm predicting this will be a
new FAQ.