X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:27:39 -0600
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: libemu and profiling (LONG) [Was: Re: Building a profiled version of libc]
Message-ID: <20011213092739.A9147@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <10112022040 DOT AA14303 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3C134C9D DOT D057D932 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3C134C9D.D057D932@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>; from rich@phekda.freeserve.co.uk on Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:35:57AM +0000
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

FWIW I did not see this with stock djgpp 2.03,
DOS 5.0, on a 386/387 machine.

-: Using the math co-pro (387 not set or set to y) gives a result of
-: 0.122385; using a patched emu387.dxe gives a result of 0.1. Shouldn't the
-: results be the same or at least a little closer?


[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET emu387=c:/djgpp/bin/emu387.dxe
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=Y
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
0.122385

[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=N
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
0.122385

[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=Q
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
80387 detected.
0.122385

[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET emu387=c:/djgpp/bin/wmemu387.dxe
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=Y
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
0.122385

[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=N
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
0.122385

[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]SET 387=Q
[C:\HACKERY\DJ\SNIPPETS]387.exe
80387 detected.
0.122385