X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:42:46 -0500
Message-Id: <200112131442.fBDEgks06133@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <1190-Thu13Dec2001081342+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Subject: Re: Description of stubs in develop.txiu
References: <200112130155 DOT CAA03721 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <200112130200 DOT fBD20uZ31345 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1190-Thu13Dec2001081342+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> I think we should allow more than that.  It's true that any change
> can be reverted or fixed later, but I think we should avoid that as
> much as possible.  Also, some people might simply have bad feelings
> about not being heard.
> 
> In other words, this is a psycholigical issue, not a technical one.
> So I basically agree with Martin's request.

Well, if that's what people want, it's OK with me.  Like I said, it's
not a big deal.