X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:13:42 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <1190-Thu13Dec2001081342+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <200112130200.fBD20uZ31345@envy.delorie.com> (message from DJ
	Delorie on Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:00:56 -0500)
Subject: Re: Description of stubs in develop.txiu
References: <200112130155 DOT CAA03721 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <200112130200 DOT fBD20uZ31345 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:00:56 -0500
> From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
> 
> > I only want a little more time than one day before people commit
> > things - say a week or so - in case somebody has objections, he might
> > not have time to see the proposal otherwise.
> 
> Given that we can always change it back, I think a day is fair for
> most changes

I think we should allow more than that.  It's true that any change
can be reverted or fixed later, but I think we should avoid that as
much as possible.  Also, some people might simply have bad feelings
about not being heard.

In other words, this is a psycholigical issue, not a technical one.
So I basically agree with Martin's request.