X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:28:15 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be
Message-Id: <9628-Mon10Dec2001212814+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <000001c181a8$e6560350$443276d5@pandora.be>
	(tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be)
Subject: Re: v2.03 refresh ready for review/testing
References:  <000001c181a8$e6560350$443276d5 AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 19:31:34 +0100
> > > 
> > > Yes, but if that's true, stubify would still be needed, and I
> > > thought that was not needed with recent versions of binutils/gcc.
> > 
> > It isn't needed only if you say "gcc -o foo.exe"
> 
> That's what I mean - if coff-go32 is the default forced by djgpp.djl,
> then foo.exe above would also be raw COFF, unless stubify was run on
> it.

We do run stubify, because `specs' says so.