X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200112080131.CAA18517@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.03 update
In-Reply-To: <000901c17f83$9fc51060$0102a8c0@acceleron> from Andrew Cottrell at "Dec 8, 2001 11:59:11 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 02:31:19 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Andrew Cottrell:
> I spotted change that was missed, but it was also forgotten in the original
> 2.03. The stub.asm file ws not updated when DJGPP 2.03 was released. The
> stub.asm on the CVS trunk is as is the version in the updated 2.03 source
> zip:
> 
>         .org    0                       ; just in case
> stubinfo:
> stubinfo_magic:                         ; char [16]
>         .db     "go32stub, v 2.02"      ; version may change, [0..7] won't
> stubinfo_size:                          ; unsigned long
>         .dd     stubinfo_end            ; bytes in structure
> 
> My suggestion is to change the stub.asm file to:-
>         .db     "go32stub, v 2.03"      ; version may change, [0..7] won't
> 
> What do you think about this?

Without me being Charles, it sounds like nobrainer.

Isn't the stub supposed to be the sa{m,n]e (a lot of smileys here)
version as DJGPP?

I could be wrong though.


Right,

						MartinS