X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10112041455.AA18688@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: Distribution issues
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:55:32 -0600 (CST)
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011204100656.25578G@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Dec 04, 2001 10:07:14 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > By the way, should the .dsm be in the .mft?
> 
> If you mean that the contents of the .dsm file should be in the .mft
> file, then I don't think so: *.mft are supposed to hold a list of
> files only.

I mean should the line "manifest/djdev203.dsm" appear in the file
"manifest/djdev203.mft"

Right now it does not (so doing rm @... doesn't remove the .dsm).  I'm
not sure how that works (I left it like 2.03, .dsm does not appear).

Should then contents of the dsm be changed to allow refreshing over
a current 2.03?  (says replaces djdev < 2.03)