X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero" Organization: Darmstadt University of Technology To: "Andrew Cottrell" Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 15:33:13 +0100 Subject: Re: gzip-1.3.2 alpha port available for testing. CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <004701c179fc$13b3e240$0102a8c0@acceleron> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54DE) Message-ID: <3427111CA7@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 11:06:17 +1100, Andrew Cottrell wrote: > 1) LIBC Usage: > Which LIBC did you use? The standard 2.03 from Simtel or a patched > version using Charles's 2.03 source patch? > > If you use the patched version then the resulting exe is then 2K and XP > compatible. Sorry, the binary package is not 2K and XP compatible. I have configured and compiled it using stock simtelnet tools (djdev203.zip). I have no access to 2K nor to XP so I have not tried to compile and test it with the latest CVS libc. This must be done by you. > 2) Will / have you sent the DJGPP changes to the gzip maintainer? That way > the changes may / will be incorporated into the enxt release. No, I have not send anything to the maintainer. IMHO it is not worth to be send something to him until the package has not been extensively tested under the different Windows/DOS versions available. Last but not least, it should also be remembered that Eli wrote the code used in this port. I have only modified it to get it working with gzip 1.3 and later version. May be he want to inspect this patch before it is submitted and may be he prefers to submite the patch himself. Regards Juan M. Guerrero