X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 15:08:07 -0600
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Which 2.12.1 source and binary test zip file
Message-ID: <20011117150807.A13930@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <00bd01c16f5b$ae341340$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10111171757510 DOT 27163-100000 AT acp3bf>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111171757510.27163-100000@acp3bf>; from broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de on Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 06:03:30PM +0100
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: > I have produced a which 2.12.1 source and binary release that is based on
-: > the GNU 2.12 plus the which.c changes for DJGPP and the patch that you sent
-: > out in September. I called it 2.12.1 as it is not the GNU 2.12 release, but
-: > a modified verison for DJGPP, is this okay?

Why not 2.12b, similar to what Eli did with gzip (until the package
maintainers got their act together and incorporated the patches).