X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:16:29 -0500
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: another termcap library option
Message-ID: <20010713131629.B4442@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <3B4D8E2E DOT 20 DOT 635925 AT localhost>; <20010712114929 DOT D2337 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3B4EE2B2 DOT 10414 DOT 724246 AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3B4EE2B2.10414.724246@localhost>; from snowball3@bigfoot.com on Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:59:46AM -0400
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: If we go with this library, then what happens now? For example, where
-: should the library go, etc.

I suppose DJ might add a new directory for the termcap functions,
e.g., `/src/libc/posix/termcap'?  Each termcap function gets its
own source file, documentation file, etc., similar to existing djgpp
libc organization.

If I understood correctly a previous post by Eli, the termcap functions
(they aren't that large) would simply be added to libc.  Or are there
other special reasons not to have a separate `libtermcap.a' ?