Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:03:59 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJDIR Windows 2000 investigation results #1
In-Reply-To: <200107112312.BAA06661@father.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010712100349.17050E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> > > I think the thinking was LFNs supported -> FAT32 supported. Thus the code.
> > 
> > Then why does _creat_new only set the FAT32 bit if the DOS version is
> > 7 or more, even in the LFN case?
> 
> Not sure. Because DOZE 7 was the first to support LFN or FAT32?
> 
> I think it was I had the _is_fat32_() in place. Then we (or I)
> realised that checking for DOZE version 7 was sufficient, perhaps?

Probably.  I think we should make _open and _creat_new consistent in
this aspect.  Perhaps after we make the decision what to do with W2K.